Legal Opinion
Hill v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 27, 1961No. 39083PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
Plaintiff in error, Johnson D. Hill (who was the plaintiff below) instituted this action to establish his ownership of certain shares of common stock in Tulsa Investment Corp., and to seek redress for the benefit of said corporation against its officers for their unauthorized and wrongful acts of management. The corporation and the individual defendants filed a joint answer and cross-petition which was followed by plaintiff’s reply and answer to the cross-petition. After the issues became joined, a judgment on the pleadings was entered against the plaintiff upon the motion of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Mullen v. ThaxtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Mountain Park Stock Farm Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Johnson v. EagleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Whitney v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Panhandle Cooperative Royalty Co. v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors v. Guardian Funeral HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Harrell v. HortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Hull v. WolfeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- West v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.