Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Eagle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 28, 1960No. 38440PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

Plaintiffs filed this suit for collection of a promissory note and for foreclosure of a real estate mortgage, given as security for said note, covering part of a lot in the “Original Town” of Tulsa. Defendants filed a verified amended answer which admitted execution of the note and mortgage but denied that the instruments were intended as binding obligations upon the defendants. In substance defendants alleged that their signatures were procured by fraud and gross misrepresentation on the part of one Darold Eagle, one of the plaintiffs, in representing that a hotel on said…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Hood v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Whipps v. Kling Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Gibson v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Greene v. HumphreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Penn Square Bank, N.A. v. Myron J. PalermoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  2. LeFlore v. Reflections of Tulsa, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Varn v. MaloneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  4. Bird v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. Investors Preferred Life Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Grace D. AbrahamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API