Legal Opinion
Hull v. Wolfe
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 27, 1964No. 40468PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
During the course of her employment in Pittsburg, Kansas, Bertha Hull, herein referred to as plaintiff, received a compensa-ble injury on August 26, 1958 for which a claim was filed with the Kansas Workmen’s Compensation Commission. She continued her employment while under treatment by a chiropractor who eventually referred her to Dr. Frank B. Wolfe, herein referred to as defendant. Consultation with defendant resulted in arrangements being made for plaintiff’s admission to the Oklahoma Osteopathic Hospital. Following admission, plaintiff signed an agreement consenting to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Adams v. Iten Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Booth & Flinn, Ltd. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Brown v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Markley v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Hill v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Thompson v. Madison MacHinery Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
- German v. Chemray, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Arrington v. Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe-Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Neugebauer v. NeugebauerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Birmingham v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.