Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Whitney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 2, 1944No. 31273PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This is an action by Mary Moye Whitney to recover damages from the defendant, E. W. Whitney, for fraudulently inducing her to enter into. a common-law marriage relationship at a time when the defendant had a living undivorced wife. After the issues were made up, the trial court sustained the defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and entered judgment accordingly, and from that judgment this appeal was prosecuted.

In her petition, the plaintiff alleged that she and the defendant'entered into the marriage contract in 1928 and resided together as husband and wife until July, 1941, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Whitney v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Mashunkashey v. MashunkasheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Taylor v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Krauter v. KrauterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Lyons v. LyonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Alexander v. KuykendallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  3. Tice v. TiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Hill v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Dudley v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API