Legal Opinion
Charles Brumbelow v. United States of America, Syble Hair Brumbelow v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 21, 1963No. 7359_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
The appellants Brumbelow, who are husband and wife, were indicted in a single indictment, and were convicted by a jury of fraudulently and knowingly concealing and facilitating the transportation and concealment of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174. Their motions for acquittal and for new trial were denied. They have appealed and urge that there was insufficient evidence to sustain their convictions.
The narcotics came into the possession of the federal agents, and they had their first knowledge of them when Thomas Hair and John Ferrell sold the heroin to them in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bernardino Chirez Hernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Ben Corbin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. Eugene JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Daniel Harold Griego v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- James Glover v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Wallace HooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Tommy L. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Peter Reuben OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Jack Harold Halfen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Donald Dean Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.