Legal Opinion
Jack Harold Halfen v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 1, 1963No. 7397_1PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, Jack Harold Halfen, was tried and convicted by a jury upon a one count indictment charging him with transporting, or causing to be transported, in interstate commerce from Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, to Omaha, Nebraska, a falsely made and forged Western Union money order, knowing the same to have been falsely made and forged, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2314. The appeal is from that judgment of conviction.
The Government first raises the question of whether this court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the appeal. It asserts that the notice of appeal was not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. SheridanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hi Holdridge, A/K/A Hiram Holdridge, Larry Shumm and Neil Delmar Haworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Boykin v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Oddo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gee v. Tenneco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Floyd Lenox McGee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Donald R. Elbel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.