Legal Opinion
United States v. Peter Reuben Ortiz
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 2, 1971No. 466-70_1PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
On a trial to the court, after a jury had been waived, appellant Ortiz was convicted on two counts of violating the federal drug laws. Count one charged Ortiz with manufacturing, compounding and processing a depressant or stimulant drug in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 331 (q) (1); count two charged possession of a depressant or stimulant drug for sale, delivery or other disposal to another in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 331(q) (3). 1 On this direct appeal from his conviction, Ortiz primarily challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, and in addition challenges a search and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Robert McClure Jr., and Donald Gaxiola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Franklin R. Masiello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Edward H. ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Donald Dean Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Robert CerritoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- People v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- United States v. Wallace HooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. ManbeckCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Hector Martin RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. LuchtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.