Daniel Harold Griego v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant-defendant Griego appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty on all four counts of an indictment charging the receipt, concealment, and sale of unlawfully imported narcotic drugs in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 174. The sole ground urged for reversal is that the trial court erred in its instructions to the jury.
So far as pertinent Section 174 reads:
“Whoever * * * knowingly * * * receives, -conceals, buys, sells, * * * any such narcotic drug after being imported * * * knowing the same to have been imported * * * contrary to law * * *…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Charles Demore JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Julio C. Valle-ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Jose Verdugo and Horace Eugene Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Francisco Restrepo-Granda, A/K/A Dario Toro GarcesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.