Legal Opinion

Daniel Harold Griego v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 10, 1962No. 6826PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant-defendant Griego appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty on all four counts of an indictment charging the receipt, concealment, and sale of unlawfully imported narcotic drugs in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 174. The sole ground urged for reversal is that the trial court erred in its instructions to the jury.

So far as pertinent Section 174 reads:

“Whoever * * * knowingly * * * receives, -conceals, buys, sells, * * * any such narcotic drug after being imported * * * knowing the same to have been imported * * * contrary to law * * *…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Charles Demore JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Julio C. Valle-ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. Jose Verdugo and Horace Eugene Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  5. United States v. Francisco Restrepo-Granda, A/K/A Dario Toro GarcesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API