Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Jordan v. Department of Licenses

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1924No. 18488PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court January 14, 1924, for a writ of mandamus to compel the department of licenses to issue to relator a license to practice dentistry.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The relator, John F. Jordan, applied to the state director of licenses for a license to practice dentistry under the act of 1923, regulating the practice of dentistry. (Laws of 1923, ch. 16, p. 24) [Bern. 1923 Sup., § 10030-1]. He failed to satisfy the director that lie possessed the qualifications to practice dentistry prescribed by the act, and a license was refused him. By this proceeding be seeks a writ of mandamus *83from this court commanding the director of licenses to issue to him such a license. In support of his application for the writ, the relator makes two principal contentions :…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Douglas v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. State ex rel. Smith v. Board of Dental ExaminersWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. In re ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State ex rel. Brown v. Board of Dental ExaminersWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State v. SextonWashington Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Barker v. WeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State v. CharrierWashington Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API