Barker v. Weeks
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Tolman, J.-
— By this action, the respondent, as plaintiff, sought recovery for services rendered as a physician and surgeon. By her answer, the defendant Ethel S. Weeks denied practically every fact alleged in the plaintiff’s complaint; and hy her cross-complaint she pleaded that the plaintiff falsely and fraudulently represented himself to he a duly qualified physician and surgeon, and that he induced her to employ him to treat her children and herself hy that false representation, coupled with other false representations regarding the physical condition of the children and herself; that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Brown v. Board of Dental ExaminersWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex rel. Jordan v. Department of LicensesWashington Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. JasperWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. LoveWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Fritz v. HorsfallWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. NjongeWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. KossWashington Supreme Court · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.