Legal Opinion

State v. Sexton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1905No. 5398PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tie superior court for King county, Kennan, J., entered May 13, 1904, upon a trial and conviction of the offense of practicing dentistry without a license.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

Appellant was prosecuted upon an information charging him with “the crime of practicing dentistry without a license,” in that he did “treat a disease and lesion of the human teeth, and did correct malpositions of the human teeth and jaws, of one R. A. Netzer,” in violation of the provisions of the “Dental Law” (Laws of 1901, pp. 314-318). From a judgment of conviction by the superior court he appeals to this court.

Appellant assails the constitutionality of this act; but that portion of the act involved in this case has been heretofore upheld by this court. See, State ex rel. Smith v. Board of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Smith v. Board of Dental ExaminersWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. In re ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Kahlenbeck v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. State v. BuchlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  5. Knapp v. Order of PendoWashington Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. Le PitreWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State v. NilnchWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State v. LaneWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State v. LittooyWashington Supreme Court · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API