Legal Opinion

Shanghai Inv. Co., Inc. v. Alteka Co., Ltd.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 2000No. 20709PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

KLEIN, J.

This appeal arises out of a contract to purchase two parcels of property by plaintiff-appellant Alteka Co., Ltd. (Alteka) from defendant/appellee/cross-appellant Windward Park, Inc. (Windward). Shanghai Investment Co. (Shanghai), the alleged assignee of a promissory note from Alteka, sued Alteka for specific performance of the agreement to assign, or, in the alternative, damages for breach of the agreement to assign in Civil No. 94-2683-07. Alteka subsequently filed suit against Windward and Thomas Enomoto (Enomoto), Windward’s principal, for return of a…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. David T. Thompson and Thompson Communications Companies, Inc. v. Davor G. GjivojeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. Poplar Grove Planting and Refining Co., Inc. v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Jackson v. Bank of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Blair v. IngHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Douglass v. Pflueger Hawaii, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Ranger Insurance Co. v. HinshawHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. PaulineHawaii Supreme Court · 2002

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API