Legal Opinion

Aickin v. Ocean View Investments Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1997No. 18163PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAMIL, Justice.

Plaintiffs-Appellants John R. Aickin, George C. Meyer, Sr., Colleen R. Meyer, and A & M Corporation (collectively Lessees) appeal from (1) the order denying their motion for summary judgment and (2) the findings of fact (FOFs), conclusions of law (COLs), and final judgment entered in the Third Circuit Court. On appeal, Lessees contend the trial court erred when it: (1) denied Lessees’ motion for summary judgment; 1 (2) admitted certain items into evidence; 2 (3) entered certain FOFs and COLs; (4) entered its final judgment, in which the court terminated the commercial lease,…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Dan v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Lemle v. BreedenHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  4. F. B. Fountain Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  5. Jones v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1939

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Chun v. Bd. of Trustees of ERSHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. OrtizHawaii Supreme Court · 1999

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API