Legal Opinion

Fruchtman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 22, 1966No. 39958PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

The plaintiff is a policyholder of defendant liability carrier who seeks a declaratory judgment construing an insurance contract containing a so- called “household exclusion.” The only issue is whether the trial court was correct in construing the following provision of the policy to hold the insurer liable:

“This policy does not apply * * *
“* * * to bodily injury to the insured or any member of the family of the insured residing in the same household as the insured.”

On November 26, 1958, plaintiff was driving an automobile insured by defendant in which his mother, Ann Fruchtman,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Giokaris v. KincaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. Simon v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Shapiro v. Republic Indemnity Co. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1958

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. ViktoraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Iowa National Mutual Insurance v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. GranilloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. Rosenberger v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Peninsula Insurance v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API