Legal Opinion
Chipurnoi v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 27, 1995PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered on August 18,1994, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to amend their bill of particulars, is dismissed as superseded by the appeal from the order of said court entered on November 14,1994, without costs. Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered on November 14, 1994, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to amend their notice of claim, is unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and leave to amend the notice of claim and to amend the bill of particulars is denied,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Daniels v. Empire-Ore, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Nowinski v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Seise v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Ortiz v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mahase v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Barksdale v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Rodriguez v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Tiburcio v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Barksdale v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.