Nowinski v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene L. Nardelli, J.), entered on or about July 1, 1991, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs cross motion to amend the notice of claim, caption and summons and complaint nunc pro tunc to designate the New York City Transit Authority in lieu of the defendants Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to deny the plaintiffs cross motion to amend the notice of claim, caption and summons and complaint, the complaint is dismissed, and otherwise…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Bender v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Luka v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Ceely v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Luka v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Konner v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Mayayev v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority BusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- LoCiciro v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Chipurnoi v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Jenal v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.