Legal Opinion

Pierson v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1982PublishedCited by 315 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

In Pierson v City of New York.

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, the motion to dismiss the city’s affirmative defense should be denied and the certified question answered in the negative.

The 1976 amendments to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law permit a court to grant an application to file a late notice of claim after the commencement of the action but preclude the court from granting an extention which would exceed “the time limited for the commencement of an action by the claimant against the public corporation” (L…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Pearl River Union Free School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Camarella v. East Irondequoit Central School BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by315 opinions

  1. Caselli v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Yang Feng Zhao v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  3. Ismail v. CohenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  4. Rechenberger v. Nassau County Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Rattner v. Planning Commission of Village of PleasantvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

310 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API