Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 10, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), entered July 6, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict finding it 56% at fault in the happening of the accident and the injured plaintiff 44% at fault, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against it on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiffs commenced this action against the defendant to recover damages arising from injuries sustained…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Amatulli v. Delhi Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Adamy v. ZiriakusNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Mazzilli v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Pinzon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kane v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Calix v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Gonzalez v. Board of Education of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Streletskaya v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Ryabchenko v. New York City Tr. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API