Legal Opinion

Barksdale v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 2002PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Louis Benza, J.), entered February 8, 2001, which granted defendant’s motion in limine to preclude plaintiff from offering evidence respecting defective design, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*211Plaintiffs notice of claim set forth a theory of liability based on the lack of and/or improperly maintained safety chains between the subway cars where the decedent allegedly fell. After expiration of the period within which amendment of her notice of claim would have been permissible, i.e. the statute of limitations, plaintiff served a bill of particulars…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Chipurnoi v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mahase v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Kane v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Chieffet v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Sutin v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Taunus Corp. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API