Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Coe

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 17, 2006No. 1-05-1891PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

The plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), filed a complaint for declaratory judgment seeking a determination that the defendant, Steven E. Coe, was not entitled to underinsured motorist benefits under his automobile liability policy with State Farm. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment. Mr. Coe appeals the order of the circuit court of Cook County granting summary judgment to State Farm and denying Mr. Coe’s motion for summary judgment.

The sole issue on appeal is the correctness of the circuit court’s order. The pertinent facts are summarized below.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the MidwestIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Gillen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Sulser v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ullman v. Wolverine InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Hoglund v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Greenfield v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  2. Holzrichter v. YorathAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  3. State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. Habitat Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Jones v. Country Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. National Ass'n of Criminal Defense Lawyers v. Chicago Police DepartmentAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API