Legal Opinion

Hoglund v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1992No. 71713, 71714 consPublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

These consolidated cases arose out of situations wherein plaintiffs were injured while they were passengers of uninsured motor vehicles when the drivers of the vehicles collided with other vehicles. In each case, the drivers of both vehicles were at fault. The drivers of the other vehicles each had bodily injury policy limits of $100,000, and this amount was paid to each plaintiff. Both plaintiffs allegedly suffered damages in excess of the $100,000 paid to them and filed claims against defendant, State Farm, each seeking uninsured motorist benefits for the excess damages under their own…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Glidden v. Farmers Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Ullman v. Wolverine InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Harthcock v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. ElkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Raitt v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Vitkus v. Beatrice Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. YapejianIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Cummins v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Reed v. Farmers Insurance GroupIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Luechtefeld v. Allstate InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API