Legal Opinion

Ocean Park Pier Amusement Corp. v. City of Santa Monica

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 1940No. Civ. 11297PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

An appeal by plaintiff and cross-defendant from certain portions of a judgment decreeing defendant and cross-complainant to be entitled to 2 per cent of the gross annual receipts derived from plaintiff’s use, operation and possession of a franchise, and the rights and privileges thereof, as described in an ordinance of the City of Santa Monica.

It appears that the ordinance granting plaintiff’s predecessor Venice Investment Company, a corporation, a franchise for the maintenance and operation of a wharf or pier, included therein a description of tide lands owned by the City of Santa Monica as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. County of Tulare v. City of DinubaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Guggenhime & Co. v. LamantiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Pasadena Ice Co. v. ReederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. In Re JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. County of Sacramento v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. City of San Diego v. Southern California Telephone Corp.California Supreme Court · 1954
  4. County of Los Angeles v. Southern Counties Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  5. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. DowneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API