Legal Opinion

City of San Diego v. Southern California Telephone Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1954No. L. A. 22321PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiff city of San Diego, by Ordinance No. 5681 granted defendant Southern California Telephone Company1 a franchise to construct, maintain, and operate *114a system of telephone poles and wires upon the public streets of the city for a period of 30 years from August 7, 1914. When the franchise expired in 1944, the company assumed that under section 536 of the Civil Code (now Pub. Util. Code, § 7901) it had the right to use the streets without a franchise, and therefore did not seek a new franchise. The city brought suit to enjoin the' company from using its streets. On May 23, 1946, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. State Board of Taxes & AssessmentsSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Sunset Tel. & Tel. Co. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. County of Tulare v. City of DinubaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Tulare Irrigation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. County of Sacramento v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Qwest Communications Corp. v. City of BerkeleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
  4. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. County of Los Angeles v. Southern Counties Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API