Legal Opinion
Matlock v. Ohio Department of Liquor Control
Ohio Court of Claims
Decided March 22, 1996No. 93-15747PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Russell Leách, Judge.
Plaintiff, Cherie L. Matlock, alleges that defendant, Ohio Department of Liquor Control, committed assault and battery upon her person, falsely arrested and imprisoned her, maliciously prosecuted her, and committed further negligent acts. Plaintiff dismissed her Section 1983, Title 42, U.S.Code action at trial. This court notes that plaintiff also seeks a determination of immunity, pursuant to R.C. 2743.02(F), regarding defendant’s agent, Harrold Torrens.
This action was heard on November 13, 1995, on the issues of liability and the R.C. 2743.02(F) determination.
On…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Love v. City of Port ClintonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Thomas v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ryan v. ConoverOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
- James H. Ex Rel. Ohio Legal Rights Service v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ronnie Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Brooks v. City of WeirtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Kaylor v. RankinDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
- Tarver v. Calex Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Jacobs v. Village of Ottawa HillsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.