Legal Opinion

Tarver v. Calex Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1998No. 96 C.A. 149PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cox, Judge.

This matter presents a timely appeal from a decision rendered by the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court, granting the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants-appellees, Calex Corporation et al., on all nine causes of action set forth in the complaint filed on March 2, 1995 by plaintiffs-appellants, James Tarver et al.

The nine causes of action in appellants’ complaint establish claims against appellees as follows:

1. Sexual harassment and discrimination in violation of R.C. Chapter 4112;

2. Racial discrimination in violation of R.C. Chapter 4112;

3. Assault and battery against…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don SchupakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Elizabeth M. Paroline v. Unisys Corporation Edgar L. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Grooms v. Supporting Council of Preventative EffortOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Williams v. York International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Dodge v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
  5. Brown v. Dover Corp., C-060123 (5-4-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API