Legal Opinion

Loehr v. Board of Education

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1910No. Civ. No. 670PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment of the superior court in favor of the plaintiff in a ma/ndwmus proceeding.

The trial court awarded plaintiff a peremptory writ, by which the board of education of the city and county of San Francisco was commanded to admit plaintiff to the position of teacher of a class designated as “A-First Grade” in a common public school of said city and county, and to approve, allow and order to be paid her demand for $83 per month as compensation for services as teacher of such grade.

The case was submitted to the court upon an agreed statement of facts,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Fairchild v. Bd. of Educ. of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Harby v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. Barthel v. Bd. of Educ. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Bates v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Leymel v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. School City of Peru v. State Ex Rel. YoungbloodIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Taylor v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Saxton v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API