Legal Opinion

Bates v. Board of Education

California Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1903No. S.F. No. 2900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s application for a writ of mandate.

It appears from the findings in the case that on August 12, 1896, the board of education of the city and county of San Francisco, defendant and respondent herein, at a regular meeting, adopted the report of its committee on classification, and thereupon appointed the plaintiff and appellant to the position of teacher of the high-school class to be formed in the Horace Mann evening school, and thereafter, on August 26th, by resolution, discontinued said Horace Mann evening school, and transferred…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Marion v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McGrath v. BurkhardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Porcelli v. TitusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  3. Loehr v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Stuart v. Bd. of Educ. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  5. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API