Fairchild v. Bd. of Educ. of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Appeal from judgment of superior court in mandamus and from order denying a new trial.
Plaintiff was, and for more than ten years before the fourteenth day of September, 1892, ha,d been, a principal teacher in the public schools of San Francisco, elected for no definite term. Upon that day she obtained a leave of absence until July 1, 1893. Upon the expiration of her leave of absence she reported for duty, and asked to be allowed to resume the position of principal of the Potrero school, which, position she was filling at the time of her vacation. That position had been filled, during her…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kennedy v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fry v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Patton v. Board of Health Etc.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Leymel v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Taylor v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Mootz v. BelyeaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.