Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Toby Earl Johnson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 30, 2014No. A13-2353PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LILLEHAUG, Justice.

Appellant Toby Earl Johnson challenges a restitution order entered against him after he was convicted of aiding and abetting the first-degree premeditated murder of Randy Pool. This matter comes to us under our authority to hear sentencing appeals in first-degree murder cases. See State v. Jones, 678 N.W.2d 1, 23 (Minn.2004); State v. Warren, 592 N.W.2d 440, 451 (Minn.1999). Johnson raises three issues before this court. First, he argues that the restitution order improperly included restitution for losses for which an insurance company had already reimbursed Pool’s…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Barbara ChaneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Wilfried Van CauwenbergheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. State v. ProfitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. People v. KimNew York Court of Appeals · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne RiggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. Nissalke v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. State of Minnesota v. Kenneth E. AndersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State of Minnesota v. Almanzo Ousley CottonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  5. State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne RiggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API