Legal Opinion
Mission Essential Personnel, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 28, 2012No. 12-33CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER1
LETTOW, Judge.
This is a post-award bid protest of an agency’s corrective action following an earlier protest before the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”). Plaintiff Mission Essential Personnel, LLC (“Mission Essential”) had challenged the award of two task orders issued by the Department of the Army (“Army” or “agency”) for intelligence support services primarily in Afghanistan under previously entered Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (“IDIQ”) contracts. During the GAO proceedings, the Army volunteered to take corrective action, which it believed would moot the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Louise J. Hamlet v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sra International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- BayFirst Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Mori Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Nexagen Networks, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.