Legal Opinion
Outlaw v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 17, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00833PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge.
This is a breach of contract claim based on the alleged breach of a July 27, 2011 Negotiated Settlement Agreement (July 27, 2011 NSA) between James F. Outlaw (plaintiff or Mr. Outlaw) and the U.S. Department of the Army (defendant or the Army).
Defendant moved for dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, alleging that because the July 27, 2011 NSA does not provide for money damages as a remedy for an asserted breach, Mr. Outlaw cannot meet the jurisdictional requirement that his claim must be money mandating.
Mr. Outlaw…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Nieves v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Rebish v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Houston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.