Legal Opinion

Holmes v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 31, 2011No. 09-746CPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

This military benefits ease involves tragic circumstances. Thomas Holmes served honorably in the United States Navy from 1971 until he retired as a Sonar Technician First Class in 1993. He died in a motor vehicle accident in 2006, leaving behind his former wife of twenty-six years, plaintiff Noreen Holmes, and his wife of just over one year, defendant-intervenor Linda Holmes. Pursuant to the terms of Noreen and Thomas Holmes’ divorce decree, Ms. Noreen Holmes had been receiving a monthly payment of Mr. Holmes’ retirement benefits, which ceased upon Mr. Holmes’…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Kuba v. KubaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Taylor-Tillotson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API