Legal Opinion

Langlois v. Administrator

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided January 8, 1963No. File 131446PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLongo, J.

This is an appeal by the administrator of the unemployment compensation act from the decision of the unemployment compensation commissioner for the first congressional district reversing the decision of the administrator that the plain tiff was not entitled to benefits for tbe statutory disqualification period because he had been discharged for wilful misconduct during the course of his employment. General Statutes §31-236 (2) (b).

The commissioner found the following facts: The plaintiff’s hours of employment were from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. from the date he was hired, on February 5, 1962, to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Gonier v. Chase Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  3. Frint Motor Car Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Shaw v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  4. Hannon v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Superior Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API