Legal Opinion

Graves v. Hunnicutt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 25, 1910No. 2096PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Eeid. June 16, 1910. cited 2 Ga. App. 349, 5 Ga. App. 340; 71 Conn. 597, s. c. 44 L. E. A. 32Í, and note. cited 73 Ga. 295 (la), 301 and eit.; Civil Code of 1895, § 5437.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

1. It was error to award a nonsuit. There was some evidence from which a jury would have been authorized to infer that the plaintiff, as a real-estate broker, was the procuring cause of the sale of the defendant’s property, although the sale was actually effected for a lower price than the broker was authorized to offer and the deal was finally closed by another real-estate agent. Hill v. Wheeler, 2 Ga. App. 349 (58 S. E. 502).

2. The testimony of the plaintiff that negotiations between himself and the purchaser had not been terminated should have been submitted to the jury; and it was for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doonan v. IvesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. Humphries & Jackson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Johnson's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  4. Hill & Moultrie v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kingston Development Co. v. KenerlyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Wilcox v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. BinnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. IDEAL REALTY COMPANY v. StorchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Washington v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API