Legal Opinion

Hill & Moultrie v. Wheeler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 18, 1907No. 330PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Complaint, from city court of Floyd county — Judge Hamilton^ December 13, 190C.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

We think the court erred in awarding a nonsuit in this case, for we think that there was an issue of fact involved, in the evidence, upon which only the jury could legally pass. The. question was certainly raised by the testimony adduced in behalf of the plaintiff, as to whether the defendant acted in good faith in selling the property himself at a lower price than he had at. first stipulated, after using the services of the real-estate agents'to find a purchaser for it and to interest him. in its advantages. Under the testimony for the plaintiffs, the jury could have found (in the absence of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doonan v. IvesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. Odell v. DozierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Humphries & Jackson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. Sharp-Boylston Co. v. LundeenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Graves v. HunnicuttCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  4. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. BinnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  5. Collier v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API