Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Wilcox

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1923No. 14503PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Brokers in whose hands property is placed for sale, in order to earn commissions on account of the sale of such property, must either have sold it or have been the procuring cause of the sale. Doonan v. Ives, 73 Ga. 295 (1); Graves v. Hunnicutt, 8 Ga. App. 99 (68 S. E. 558).

2. Where property placed in the hands of a broker for sale is subsequently sold by the owner, the broker is entitled to the commission if he was the procuring cause of the sale, although .the sale was actually consummated by the owner. Hardin v. Stansel, 13 Ga. App. 22 (1) (78 S. E. 681); Case Threshing Machine Co. v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. O'BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Doonan v. IvesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  4. Graves v. HunnicuttCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  5. Edwards v. Andrews Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Nestle Co. v. JH EWING & SON, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Pinkerton & Laws Co. v. Atlantis Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Swift & Company v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  4. Hendrix v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  5. Erwin v. WenderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API