Legal Opinion

Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Binns

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1918No. 9568PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Washington—Judge Wynne. February 8, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

1. It appearing, from the evidence, that the witness for the defendant did. not himself sell to the plaintiff the items attempted to be set off and shown in the itemized statement attached to his interrogatories, that he had no personal knowledge of such items, and that his only knowledge of the correctness of the account was derived from the books of the company alone, the correctness of the account was not sufficiently proved, and the court did not err in excluding the itemized statement. Dougan v. Dunham, 115 Ga. 1012 (42 S. E. 390) ; Swift v. Oglesby, 8 Ga. App. 540 (70 S. B. 97).

2. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Doonan v. IvesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. Gresham v. ConnallySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Graves v. HunnicuttCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  4. Swift v. Oglesby & SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Dougan & Sheftall v. DunhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Scott v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Wilcox v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Hendrix v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. Edwards v. Andrews Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  5. IDEAL REALTY COMPANY v. StorchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API