Legal Opinion

Magallan v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 2011No. H034892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHARA, J.

Petitioner Amulfo Magallan was charged by complaint with a felony. He filed a suppression motion in advance of the preliminary examination. Magallan then filed a discovery motion seeking material related to his suppression motion, which the prosecutor had refused to provide. The magistrate granted his discovery motion. The prosecution filed a writ petition in the superior court challenging the magistrate’s order on the ground that the magistrate was precluded by statute from ordering this discovery. A panel of three superior court judges, who were the same three judges who…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. People v. HanselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Bridgeforth v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. People v. BarajasCalifornia Superior Court · 2018
  4. Holland v. Super. Ct. CA6California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Luis Vargas v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API