Magallan v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHARA, J.
Petitioner Amulfo Magallan was charged by complaint with a felony. He filed a suppression motion in advance of the preliminary examination. Magallan then filed a discovery motion seeking material related to his suppression motion, which the prosecutor had refused to provide. The magistrate granted his discovery motion. The prosecution filed a writ petition in the superior court challenging the magistrate’s order on the ground that the magistrate was precluded by statute from ordering this discovery. A panel of three superior court judges, who were the same three judges who…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. HanselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Bridgeforth v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. BarajasCalifornia Superior Court · 2018
- Holland v. Super. Ct. CA6California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Luis Vargas v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.