Legal Opinion

People v. Barajas

California Superior Court

Decided July 30, 2018No. BR 053647PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKumar, J.

*3Penal Code section 991 is the legislative safeguard that allows an in-custody misdemeanant to require the arraigning magistrate to determine whether there is probable cause to believe the defendant has committed a public offense. ( Pen. Code, § 991, subd. (a).) If the magistrate finds no such probable cause, the defendant is entitled to a dismissal of the charge. ( Pen. Code, § 991, subd. (d).)1

*499We are presented with the following issue: Does section 991 vest the trial court with the discretion to consider, as part of its determination of probable cause, whether the defendant's detention prior…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barajas v. Appellate DivisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API