Legal Opinion
Bridgeforth v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 25, 2013No. B244661PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MALLANO, P. J.
Petitioner George Elex Bridgeforth, Jr., is charged with four offenses, including attempted murder and murder, with a special circumstance allegation that the murder was committed while Bridgeforth was *1077engaged in the commission of a robbery. The trial court denied Bridgeforth’s nonstatutory motion to dismiss the information, which was based upon the theory that the prosecutor’s failure to disclose, prior to the preliminary hearing, photographs of the attempted murder victim’s truck denied him the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses and the right to effective…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. FigueroaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. Hull, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017