Legal Opinion

People v. Hansel

California Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1992No. S020080PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PANELLI, J.

When a defendant’s motion to suppress evidence at the preliminary examination is denied and the defendant renews it in the superior court, are the People permitted to recall witnesses only when the defendant presents new evidence at the second hearing, under Penal Code section 1538.5, subdivision (i)? We conclude that the People’s right to recall witnesses is not so limited. We also conclude that the statute, so construed, does not violate the defendant’s constitutional rights to due process and compulsory process.

I. Facts

Defendants and respondents Vienna Rae Hansel, Kevin…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. FalsettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. M.S.California Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API