Legal Opinion

Rauser v. Toston Irrigation District

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1977No. 13243PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

George Rauser and Phyllis Rauser, husband and wife, brought this action in the district court, Broadwater County, against the Toston Irrigation District and members of the Board of Commissioners of that District. The complaint alleged a portion of Rausers’ land was taken without compensation, and construction of the irrigation project with resultant seepage caused water to stand stagnant on approximately forty acres of plaintiffs’ land situated along Warm Spring Creek. It alleged this amounted to the taking of a flood easement.

Defendant’s motion to strike the individual board members as…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. United States v. Kansas City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Reardon v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Knight v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Blasdel v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Wohl v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Thelen v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. K & R Partnership v. City of WhitefishMontana Supreme Court · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API