Legal Opinion

K & R Partnership v. City of Whitefish

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 2008No. DA 06-0051PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Appellant City of Whitefish (Whitefish) appeals from the jury verdict and final order of the Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County, awarding Appellee K&R Partnership (K&R) $161,000 for its inverse condemnation claim and $94,788.23 for litigation expenses. K&R cross appeals, challenging the District Court’s decision to disallow “cost to cure” evidence and the court’s partial denial of its claimed expenses. We reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with the opinion herein.

¶2 We consider the following issues on appeal, beginning with the issues…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mary J. Baker Revocable Trust v. Cenex Harvest States, Cooperatives, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Rumph v. Dale Edwards, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Anderson v. StokesMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Rauser v. Toston Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Dayberry v. City of East HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wohl v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Ballard v. Devon Energy Production Co., LPCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  3. City of Missoula v. Mountain Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. City of Missoula v. Mountain Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Covey v. BrishkaMontana Supreme Court · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API