Legal Opinion
Matter of Brown
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 4, 1996No. 94-BG-1548 & 95-BG-235PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On consideration of the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, recommending that the respondent be suspended for sixty days, the letter from Bar Counsel electing not to note an exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, and it appearing that respondent has not filed an exception to the discipline recommended by the Board on Professional Responsibility nor has respondent filed his affidavit of compliance with the provisions of D.CApp.R. XI, § 14(g), in connection with his interim suspension, it is
ORDERED,…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re RosenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re OntellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- In Re JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Hayes v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
4Cited by4 opinions
- In Re BenjaminDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re UchenduDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re SlaughterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re GeorgeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999