Matakitis v. Woodmansee
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order dated November 22, 1994, dismissing appellants’ exceptions and entering a final decree. Appellants, John and Carol Woodmansee [“Woodmansee”], now raise the following issues for our review.
I. WHETHER [APPELLEES] RAY AND MAY ARE ENTITLED TO A RIGHT OF WAY ACROSS WOODMANSEE’S LOT?
II. WHETHER THE WIDTH OF THE RIGHT OF WAY MAY EXCEED FIFTEEN FEET?
III. WHETHER THE RIGHT OF WAY MAY BE UTILIZED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES?
IV. DID WOODMANSEE JUSTIFIABLY REMOVE A GATE CONSTRUCTED BY MATAKITIS ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY?
V. what IS THE PROPER MEASURE OF DAMAGES TO…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Weir by Gasper v. Estate of CiaoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Hodges v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Taylor v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Lease v. DollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Zettlemoyer v. Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Soderberg v. WeiselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Moore v. DuranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Sprankle v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Christian v. YanoviakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Trustees of Conneaut Lake Park, Inc. v. Park Restoration, LLC (In re Trustees of Conneaut Lake Park, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.