Legal Opinion

Soderberg v. Weisel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1997No. 01627PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CIRILLO, President Judge Emeritus:

This is an appeal from a final decree entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The majority of the facts relevant to a determination of this appeal are not contested. The parties agree that an easement by prescription exists consisting of an access lane on property owned by Carl and Sharon Soderberg (“The Soderbergs”). 1 Appellants, Lester L. Weisel and Agnus M. Weisel (“The Weisels”), use the easement for ingress and egress of farm equipment to their farm from Sleepy Hollow Road in Milford Township,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Meeting House Lane, Ltd. v. MelsoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. American Ass'n of Meat Processors v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Niles v. Fall Creek Hunting Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Davis v. BrukSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  5. Plauchak v. BolingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Lewis v. YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Chun v. Bd. of Trustees of ERSHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Thomas Jefferson University v. WapnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Juniata Valley Bank v. Martin Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Morin v. BrassingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API