Legal Opinion

Zettlemoyer v. Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1995PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTEMURO, Justice.

Appellant, Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corporation (Transco), appeals from an order and opinion of the Commonwealth Court reversing an order of the Court of Common Pleas that sustained Transco’s preliminary objections and dismissed Appellees’ petition for appointment of a Board of Viewers under the Eminent Domain Code, 26 Pa.S. §§ 1-101 to 1-903.

The issue presented for our consideration is whether Tran-sco committed a de facto taking of Appellees’ land by clearing an area 30 feet beyond the 100 foot right of way it had maintained on Appellee’s property since 1958.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Percy A. Brown & Co. v. RaubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Merrill v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Taylor v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Michael D. TarbuckCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Soderberg v. WeiselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. PARC Holdings, Inc. v. KillianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. McNAUGHTON PROPERTIES, LP v. BarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Miller & Son Paving, Inc. v. Plumstead TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API