Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ben Bennett, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 2005No. E035349PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHLI, J.

In this case, we must decide whether the statute tolling the limitations period for an action based on a health care provider’s “professional negligence” (Code Civ. Proc., § 364, subd. (d); see also id., subd. (a)) applies to a claim against a health care provider for the enhanced remedies available under the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 15600 et seq.) (hereafter the Elder Abuse Act or the Act). We will hold that it does not. Accordingly, the trial court properly sustained a demurrer to the plaintiff’s elder abuse claims on the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Delaney v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Carter v. Prime Healthcare Paradise Valley LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Unruh-Haxton v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Pga W. Residential Ass'n, Inc. v. Hulven Int'l, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Larson v. UHS of Rancho Springs CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Perlin v. Fountain View Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API