Legal Opinion
Wamiq SATTAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOTOROLA, INC., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 12, 1998No. 96-3084PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.
After enduring a lengthy campaign of religious harassment from his supervisor, Wam-iq Sattar was first transferred to a different section, then placed on probationary status, and finally was terminated from his position as an engineer for Motorola. Believing that the supervisor’s religious intolerance lay behind his termination, Sattar sued Motorola and his two immediate superiors, raising claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(l), and under state law. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants on Sattar’s Title…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kimberly Hern Troupe v. The May Department Stores Company, Doing Business as Lord & TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Gary Millbrook v. Ibp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Montgomery v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Mary A. O'Regan v. Arbitration Forums, Inc., a New York Not-For-Profit Corporation, and Yvonne WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Martin I. Robin v. Espo Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Latice Porter v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.