Legal Opinion
Latice Porter v. City of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 8, 2012No. 11-2006PublishedCited by 166 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Latiee Porter sued the City of Chicago, alleging that the City failed to accommodate her religious practice, discriminated against her on the basis of her religion, and retaliated against her for engaging in protected activity in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The district court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment and denied Porter’s motion for partial summary judgment, and Porter appealed. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
As this is an appeal from an award of summary judgment to the City, we must construe the facts in the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Goodman v. National Security Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HardisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by166 opinions
- Lavalais v. Village of Melrose ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Edith McCurry v. Kenco Logistic Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Jerome Cole v. Board of Trustees of NorthernCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Sikiru Adeyeye v. Heartland Sweeteners, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.